Machine Learning as a Tool for Refining Diffusion Sintering Models of Al2O3 Ceramics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32515/2664-262X.2026.14(45).185-193

Keywords:

Industry 4.0, sintering, diffusion kinetics, machine learning, model

Abstract

The primary objective of this research is to evaluate the predictive accuracy of classical deterministic models versus machine learning algorithms in determining the final grain size of alumina ceramics. This study aims to identify the specific limitations of the traditional Coble model within complex powder systems and establish high-precision alternatives for microstructural control. Furthermore, the research explores the potential for energy consumption optimization by refining the thermal and kinetic parameters of the sintering process through advanced data analysis.

This study conducts a comprehensive comparative analysis between the analytical Coble model and the Random Forest ensemble learning algorithm. The initial stage involved testing the classical model with standard literature constants (n=3, Q=395 kJ/mol), which revealed significant systematic errors and overestimations. Subsequently, the deterministic model was optimized using the least squares method, adjusting physical parameters to n=2 and Q=451 kJ/mol to better suit the experimental data. In parallel, a machine learning framework was developed and trained on experimental datasets, utilizing Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and R-squared (R2) metrics for performance evaluation. A critical component of the work was the Feature Importance analysis, which quantified the relative impact of temperature, sintering time, and MgO dopant concentration on grain growth kinetics. The developed software tool was tested for its ability to simulate densification saturation points, providing a basis for digital twin integration in ceramic manufacturing. The methodology bridges the gap between theoretical material science and practical industrial applications.

The results demonstrate that the Random Forest model significantly outperforms deterministic approaches, reducing prediction error by 25 times (MAE=1.65 μm) with an R2 of 0.91. Feature Importance analysis revealed that sintering time (weight 0.485) exerts a more substantial influence on final microstructure than temperature (0.475) or MgO additives (0.040) for the studied dataset. This kinetic dominance suggests that peak sintering temperatures can be replaced by extended isothermal holding, potentially lowering energy consumption by 10–15%. The proposed ML-based approach provides a robust foundation for the development of digital twins, ensuring precise microstructural control while minimizing R&D costs.

Author Biographies

Yurii Kovalov, Central Ukrainian National Technical University, Kropyvnytskyi, Ukraine

Associate Professor, PhD in Technics (Candidate of Technics Sciences), Associate Professor of the Department of Materials Science and Foundry Production

Serhii Kovalov , Central Ukrainian National Technical University, Kropyvnytskyi, Ukraine

PhD in Pedagogy (Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences), Associate Professor of the Department of Higher Mathematics and Physics

Illia Yevmenyev, Central Ukrainian National Technical University, Kropyvnytskyi, Ukraine

student

References

References

1. Kingery, W. D., Bowen, H. K., & Uhlmann, D. R. (1976). Introduction to Ceramics (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

2. Coble, R. L. (1961). Sintering crystalline solids. II. Experimental test of diffusion models in powder compacts. Journal of Applied Physics, 32(5), 793–799.

3. Rahaman, M. N. (2003). Ceramic Processing and Sintering (2nd ed.). Marcel Dekker.

4. Guo, J., Floyd, R., Lowum, S., Maria, J.-P., Herisson de Beauvoir, T., Seo, J.-H., & Randall, C. A. (2019). Cold sintering: Progress, challenges, and future opportunities. Annual Review of Materials Research, 49, 275–295.

5. Wang, C., Ping, W., Bai, Q., Cui, H., Hensley, R., Hitz, E., Han, X., Liu, Y., Li, T., Foster, P. R., Xu, J., Lin, L., Zhao, J., Xie, H., Fu, J., Baker, B. A., Mo, Y., Viswanathan, V., & Hu, L. (2020). A general method for synthesizing and sintering bulk ceramics in seconds. Science, 368(6490), 521–526.

6. Biesuz, M., & Sglavo, V. M. (2019). Flash sintering of ceramics: Issues and opportunities. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, 16(2), 462–472.

7. Yang, Z., & Li, J. (2021). Machine learning and densification in sintering: A review. Acta Materialia, 217, Article 114138.

8. Ashby, M. F. (1974). A first report on sintering diagrams. Acta Metallurgica, 22(3), 275–289.

9. German, R. M. (1996). Sintering Theory and Practice. Wiley.

10. Rice, R. W. (1998). Porosity of Ceramics. Marcel Dekker.

11. Schiller, K. K. (1958). Strength of highly porous brittle materials. Nature, 181(4616), 1147–1148.

12. Bennison, S. J., & Harmer, M. P. (1985). Grain growth kinetics for alumina in the absence of a liquid phase. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 68(1), C-22–C-24.

13. Hillert, M. (1965). On the theory of normal and abnormal grain growth. Acta Metallurgica, 13(3), 227–238.

14. Brook, R. J. (1969). Pore-grain boundary interactions and grain growth. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 52(1), 54–55.

15. Aulin, V. V., Kovalov, S. H., Kovalov, Yu. H., & Hrinkiv, A. V. (2026). Optimization of reliability and efficiency parameters of production systems and automated lines using artificial intelligence methods: Monograph (V. V. Aulin, Ed.). Kropyvnytskyi: Lysenko V. F. [in Ukrainian]

16. Kovalov, Yu. H., Aulin, V. V., Kovalov, S. H., Kuzyk, O. V., & Hrynkiv, A. V. (2025). Artificial intelligence in materials science research: trends, tools and transformations. Central Ukrainian Scientific Bulletin. Technical Sciences, 12(43), part II, 134–142. [in Ukrainian]

17. Kovalov, Yu. H., Aulin, V. V., Kovalov, S. H., Kuzyk, O. V., & Hrynkiv, A. V. (2025). Digitalization of materials science and directions of artificial intelligence use. Bulletin of Kharkiv National Highway University, (111), 67–74. [in Ukrainian]

Published

2026-06-11

How to Cite

Kovalov, Y., Kovalov , S., & Yevmenyev, I. (2026). Machine Learning as a Tool for Refining Diffusion Sintering Models of Al2O3 Ceramics. Central Ukrainian Scientific Bulletin. Technical Sciences, (14(45), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.32515/2664-262X.2026.14(45).185-193

Most read articles by the same author(s)